No one can tolerate that the movement 5 Star is at opposition

Everytime I turn the 01 June 1974 I feel bad. Parliament today only took office and are already three days they all attack the elect of the movement 5 Stars as if they were the real culprits of the collapse Italian. Have not yet been able to say "beeh" I already do not let you talk. A show unworthy.

But where is democracy? Where are the rights of citizens and voters if even we hear (and I heard him say, Alas, repeatedly) the Constitution does not mandate constraint, implying with these words that the newly elected are free, indeed obliged to do exactly the opposite of what they promised to voters during the election campaign.

Personally I am convinced that it would be better if our Constitution foresaw the constraint of mandate and in fact would prefer that you could find a system to rate a binding program before people, but we must bear in mind that our founding fathers, the inclusion of this clause, they didn't have certain plans to open the doors to a system Tartuffe and fraudulent, but to leave in any case, the freedom of conscience to the elect on individual issues that could have been introduced.

All this reminds me of my personal story that story just to give the dimension of how the best laws can be misinterpreted.

A colleague had signed a power of attorney to be represented as a party to proceedings because he was terrified by the pressures exerted on him the attorneys of the Bank for which he worked and had fear, lying just at that moment, being tricked or somehow forced to say or do anything prejudicial to him. When I was at the hearing in his place, poured suddenly upon me all instances, all pleadings, all the threats that the poor would have to undergo if it had been present. Since I was already accustomed to these filthy gimmicks, repelled him with the utmost calm every polite "request" and demanded by the judge – who Needless to say had assisted impassively at my lynching – taking finally the hearing as provided by law.

To my surprise I was nicknamed by the opposing counsel that he screamed: “This behaviour constitutes an infringement of unfaithful patronage!!!”

Now the infidel patronage is the crime committed by the lawyer or by the delegate who defends poorly attended her, and therefore favors the opposing side, Maybe for money. I was there to fight tooth and nail to prevent the link a transaction to sfavorevolissima him and the opposing party – that certainly from my behavior was not benefited – she accused him of being unfaithful patronage, exactly as if the fellow interest coincided with his.

It's called Flip omelets.

And that is what is happening in this electoral period: the movement 5 Star is the largest party in the nation, but the majority premium given, albeit indirectly, the Democratic Party that has fewer votes. During one of the broadcasts of Santoro suggested that it would be better if the coalition headed by Bersani renounced majority premium allowing attribution, According to a principle more democratic, the party that won the election. Especially since the Constitutional Court seems to have already ruled on the opposition of the so called porcellum General democratic principles of our legal system. If you put into practice such an operation the movement 5 stars would have the majority and could govern alone. Needless to say, such a hypothesis sounds to certain ears as a cursing. Though the Democratic Party has a majority to govern. So what? Here too: instances, supplications, cheat codes, threats, wrongful, to force the "Gates" in not keeping our word, to force them to do anything against the interest of their movement and their constituents.

At any cost the Democratic Party claims that the movement 5 stars participate in your Government, I vote the confidence, talking is, in a nutshell, involved. And they get upset openly when they receive the obvious rejection of those who may not want to do anything else. It's a baffling attitude. For more, from about 48 hours, every time you turn on the television there is someone who calls on Cricket, or its agent, to have a sense of responsibility, thinking about Italy, in remembrance of the unemployed, There are some who accused him of wanting to keep out, There are seniors, interviewed on the street, who cry blaming him of all wickedness,.

In short, we understand very well that the Democratic Party is in a serious embarrassment: led campaign trying to make everyone forget about having supported the Government together with Berlusconi and that he made an accessory to serious abuses against the Italian people.

He managed to keep afloat with the excuse (painful) to be had for the good of Italy, implying that never again there would be a Monti bis, but in the meantime the declarations of intent were unequivocal in support of the policy already undertaken. With a myopia worthy of a mole did not realise that the movement 5 stars grew and did not understand that the coalition of mountains would take very few votes.

And now he finds himself at this junction: or govern with the support of the movement 5 stars, involving them in some way in the usual games of power to be able to drag it to the logic of "all guilty, all innocent "been so future growth, or fall back on a bis Mountains along with Berlusconi, knowing full well that this will be his undoing.

But he reckoned without the landlord because the same Cricket recently wrote on his blog that he prefers natural death to assisted suicide. Nevertheless, the Democratic Party doesn't give, in fact insists more.

Yes, because as he says pointedly Manzoni: "it is a general trend of men, When are agitated and distressed, and see what another might do to remove them in the way, to ask him with instance and repeatedly and with all kinds of excuses; and the smart ones, When they are distressed and agitated, fall also under this common law. So it is that, in such circumstances, are mostly such a petty figure. Those found masters, those lovely slyness with which are accustomed to win, that son become almost second nature to them and, that, implemented in time and conducted with the calmness of mind, with the peace of mind you need, make the shot so well and so secretly, and also known, After successful, receive universal applause; the poor things, When I'm in a bind, the endeavour quickly, madly, without garbo or grace.

So that one who sees them wits and disentangling. like that, make piety and movon laughter, and the man who claim to put in the Middle, albeit less noticed them, Discover a great time all their game, and from those tricks earns lumen per se, against them. So you can never quite recommend to outsmart profession of conservar always their cold blood, or of being always the strongest, that is the surest.” (Promessi Sposi-Chapter XV).