Today, 8 December 2014, appeared on the DAILY MADE an article about a strange news: apparently the OECD namely ’ Organization for economic cooperation and development has officially stated that Italy " is the first town to cheques social security burden on public spending”.

According to this Organization, l ’ impact on total State output would be 32% and reform Fornero would make the system more sustainable but would have an adverse effect on the income of those who leave from work. From the OECD, concludes that “You have to work longer”.

Later the Organization, explains that the crisis has prompted most countries to speed up reforms to make their pension systems financially sustainable, raising taxes on income from pensions and pension contributions, by reducing or postponing the indexation of benefits and increasing the retirement age. Efforts that, According to the OECD, translate into progress "encouraging”.

“But the rapid demographic change and the global economic slowdown emphasise the need to continue reforms. We need to better communicate the message they work longer and contribute more is the only way to get a decent income in retirement”.

It suggested that the whole argument is based on statistics do not share that probably were used without reference to the context to which they relate.

Moreover, the OECD is an international economic research organization private ’ for member countries that is a legal entity without any public scrutiny and therefore cannot express anything other than the personal opinion of its vertices.

In addition, from the same article, shows how these results are based on a mistake that probably affect any comparison with data from other countries.

In fact l’ OECD States that “every 10 euros of public spending, the Italy it allocates 3,2 pensions“, without making any distinction between social pensions, namely those attributed to elderly persons without income and who have never paid contributions (public expenditure) and pensions of workers for life poured a share of their income and subtracts it from your salary (deferred salaries, worker-owned since from’ origin). Because of this imaginative mix of accounting (For more all-Italian), in fact, l’ INPS pays social pensions using contributions from workers NO OUTLAY BY STATE. It is therefore evident that the’ statement of’ OECD should be amended: “every 10 euros of public spending the Italian workers already paying out of THEIR POCKETS 3,2 Euro for pensions, including social pensions that should be borne by the public finance and including high pensions of boyars and of State employees for which the State never paid a single euro“. So my question is this: by what right do you ask the Italian workers, already burdened by such unwarranted burdens, to give up their sacrosanct social security rights to give even to the State, no other money, But years of work and life?

Oppression generated by the reform Fornero not enough, you have to add outrage to outrage until the Italian company has been stated entirely to 1850?