CORONAVIRUS AND STATE AMATEURISM
Vi sono alcune nozioni scientifiche che potrebbero aiutare a risolvere il problema dell’ epidemic in progress without reducing us to hunger, without closing the shops, without annihilating people's lives, come invece si sta facendo e che dimostrano come l’azione del governo CONTE2 sia guidata da una forma strana di dilettantismo se non da ignoranza.
In Inghilterra, in the 1960s, it was started, with state funding, a research on cold viruses that led to interesting conclusions. before these studies the world did not even know that colds were caused by several different viruses, one of which is there’ now famous coronavirus that, in its original form, it only causes sneezing and nasal constipation. therefore in ten years of research it was found that:
1) all cold viruses linger in the throat for 24 hours before spreading into’ organism through the’ intestine;
2) in these 24 hours viruses can be killed by substances ranging from virus to virus’ other;
3) the most common cold virus is the rhinovirus (85% of cases)
4) zinc is effective against rhinovirus
5) the zinc to completely kill the rhinovirus must be deposited in the throat very slowly for which some tablets have been patented (denominate “zinc diamonds”) today freely sold on the English and American market which, suck slowly, manage to distribute zinc in the throat very slowly and thus eliminate any cold symptoms within two minutes of the end of the’ hiring (I have been taking them regularly for years and I can guarantee that they are very effective – they can also be bought on the internet at some American sites)
6) no other substances against the coronavirus have been identified because the research at some point was no longer funded.
During these covid epidemics, however, the Chinese have ascertained that the coronavirus dies in contact with the’ alcohol and with chlorine e, For example, Benagol candies (like many other oral disinfectants commonly sold in pharmacies) contain substances derived from’ alcohol and chlorine, but more harmless. so I do not understand where the problem lies or why the ministry of health and the government as a whole have been silent on this important information given that Benagol candies are regularly sold in pharmacies (without prescription) as disinfectants of the oral cavity and adjuvants in’ eliminate infections of the mouth and throat from both viruses and bacteria. however, if it is true that the most effective prevention against contagion is the disinfection of hands and face, it seems to me that it is intuitive that also disinfecting the throat can be useful. l’ information from the English research is that it is very useful if done slowly, very slow release of the active ingredient and WITHIN THE 24 HOURS FROM THE CONTAGION. l’ the only caution to use is to buy Benagol without sugar if you are diabetic and not to give Benagol to children under the age of four due to the risk that the candy could go sideways and cause suffocation. for the rest (apart from any allergies, but there are also people allergic to strawberries) I think they disinfect the throat with these pills, sucking one in the morning and one in the evening (the recommended dose is one every three hours, but it is certainly excessive in order to avoid contagion) can be very effective and cannot make anyone run any risk, especially if the candies intended for children older than 4 years and old people are crumbled into small pieces . But this is only one of the precautions that could profitably be used in place of the lockout. for example there are UVC lamps (completely harmless to the’ man) capable of disinfecting the’ aria al 98% indoors and therefore very useful for sanitizing shops, offices and supermarkets, there are ozone generators capable of sanitizing any surface if left on for 10 minutes in a closed room etc.. etc. these are not secret devices seen and considered that they are commonly used in big industry and that with little money can be purchased by individuals. yet the Italian government has never mentioned it and has never made it the subject of incentives. but the Italian government has never even used television to inform us about the correct behavior to adopt. for example, he has always only issued recommendations on washing his hands frequently without ever adding that a correct disinfection would also include washing the face and that best of all it would be a complete shower (that is, washing your hair too) when you go home. no one remembered that many years ago, there was an attack on the Tokyo subway in which terrorists spread a deadly virus everywhere. it could have been a massacre, but there was not a single victim. many hypotheses were made about the reasons for this great fortune and finally a group of scientists concluded that the success was due to the following habits of the Japanese people:
1) leave close to’ I leave the house the shoes used to go outside and wear a pair of slippers;
2) take a full shower every evening as soon as you return home;
3) staying home with clothes other than those worn outside. these considerations are certainly reliable.
Infatti oggi (18/11/2020) i morti per coronavirus giapponesi sono 1.895 its 126,5 millions of inhabitants, while in Italy the dead are 47.217 about 60 millions of inhabitants. that is, practically in Italy almost fifty times more people die than in Japan. In short, between incompetence, disinformation and amateurism, in the end who pays is alone, as always the Italian people, but apparently no one is ashamed.
The truth about the liver transplants or l’ use of alpha lipoic acid to prevent liver transplants
The 30 September 1946, the judges of the Court of Nuremberg trials condemned the SS, by declaring them a’ criminal organization.
The judges pointed out that judgment declaring that: the SS were used for purposes that they were criminals, that included: the persecution and extermination of the Jews, police brutality and executions in the concentration camps, excesses in the ’ administration of the occupied territories, l ’ administration of the programme of work of slavery and the mistreatment and murder of prisoners of war (IMT, 1946, Vol. XXII, p. 516, in: Hoehne, 1969, p. 3). The ruling kept declaring that the war crimes suspect would involve all people who were officially accepted as members of the SS… who became or were members of the ’ organization knowing that was used to commit criminal acts declared by article ’ 6 London on war crimes statute (International Military Tribunal, 1947-1949, Vol. XXII, p. 517 in: Hoehne, 1969, p. 3).
The Nazi experiments on humans camps involved experiments on large heights, on the freezing, on the potabilita of ’ sea water, Burns and poisonings with phosgene and mustard gas ’, research on typhus, homosexual experiments, techniques and practice of castration in ’ man and woman, experiments on dysentery, yellow fever, tuberculosis in children, led by doctor Kurt Heissmeyer, viral hepatitis, experiments on twins and dwarves, experimental infections in man ’ for the study of sulfa drugs, experimental transplants of bone fractures and, experimental transplants of organs, collection of skeletons and skulls, experiments with poisons, vivisection experiments, experiments on blood groups, psychiatric experiments, gynecological experiments, experiments on malnutrition.
However the Nuremberg trials was almost a farce: the Nazi hierarchy caught and convicted were relatively few. The real culprits of extermination, in majority, managed to evade capture thanks to’ Organization O.D.E.S.S. TO. (acronym German by Organisation Der Ehemaligen SS-Angehoerigen, Organization of former members of the SS).
The birth of O.D.E.S.S. in. should be reported to a time before the end of the war: the 10 August 1944, the “Maison Rouge“, in Strasbourg.
Seventy-seven Nazis you don't draw any illusion on what would have been the final outcome of the war ’, gathered to organize their salvation. They came to the House the spokesmen of the highest hierarchs, whom Martin Bormann, Albert Speer, Wilhelm Canaris, and the biggest industrialists and German bankers. The first were aimed only at getting away with it, the second to preserve the immense accumulated earnings with war supplies the German State. At best, the SS men were sentenced to death by the winners and entrepreneurs dispossessed of all their possessions.
The two groups found a mutually beneficial agreement: entrepreneurs would fund the escape of Hierarchs, which would secure and managed all funds transferred all foreign ’. The hierarchs would I mean allowed the escape of the German capitals in friendly countries, and in return the industry would “thanked” technical managers of foreign companies all transplanted ’ Chevalier.
Following the ’ meeting in Strasbourg substantial sums of money were transferred to banks of neutral countries: Switzerland, Spain, Turkey and especially Argentina and Paraguay. With German capitals were created shortly several companies: According to a report by the United States Treasury Department dating 1946 were overall 750 businesses financed by industrialists Nazis; 112 in Spain, 58 in Portugal, 35 in Turkey, 214 in Switzerland, 98 in Argentina and 233 in various other countries, including’ Italy.
To help the hierarchs on the run, According to Wiesenthal, would be some prelates of the Catholic Church and especially the Franciscans that hid the fugitives from a monastery all ’ more. Wiesenthal Center believes that this aid has been given misunderstanding the concept of Christian charity. Sought after as Heinrich Mueller, Head of Gestapo and many more war criminals probably used O.D.E.SS. In. to disappear and ended up never being more found; other Nazis as Adolf Eichmann, Erich Priebke, Klaus Barbie, Aribert Heim, took refuge in Latin America, essentially in countries without extradition, and they could be exposed and brought to justice only after many years.
Josef Mengele, the cruel doctor who to Aushwitz was killing children with his experiments, and that was particularly involved in organ transplants, discovering after sacrificing many victims, they could only take place among people living, PARE, Instead, He was hired by the CIA to make known to the Americans the results of his research made in the death camps and so could continue its studies on the human brain, on twins and transplantation.
So it seems that the Nazi's organizational structure has survived the defeat and has continued to be operational in Europe and the United States and unnoticeably atrociously, occupying top levels often and infiltrating widely in institutions.
I made this premise that some may consider fanciful because, in my opinion, all of the foregoing, If proven, could explain many strange things in relation to the total overturning of’ Ethics, took place in these years, on the problem of explants.
And’ needed change philosophy and language to mask the incontrovertible fact that the explants are made from living people.
Plus for some time now is starting to come up on the issue of costs that the community has to face for l’ purchase of anti rejection.
For example, If the given and truthfully, It seems, as you read on some internet sites, that the cost that must face the public health to replenish medications each patient transplanted to the liver is approximately one hundred thousand euros.
However this same sum is, at the same time, acquired by pharmaceutical companies producing the anti rejection medication, one can therefore conclude that every liver transplant is a disaster for the Italian public health and take to the industrialists of the medicine concerned.
Also this observation could explain the reason for the proliferation of many liver transplants many of which, Instead, could be avoided if only you rat-affected patients some IV alpha lipoic acid value, Alas, a few tens of euros.
I'm already sure that my post will be attacked by hundreds of angry doctors, whom, in perfect good faith you will feel offended and bypassed in their profession from these my comments. The fact that the medical profession in General (not all doctors, Luckily) uses which privileged information channel, In addition to the information Ministry of health, the information from the same pharmaceutical companies producing the medicines. So if a drug more than valid is considered little profitable, pharmaceutical medical sales slam into oblivion and general practitioners or specialists, taken as are their frantic activity in patient care, do not take more into account and prefer to prescribe medications less effective and often more harmful generation.
I mean we forget perhaps too facilitates the old adage: “never ask’ host if the wine and good”.
Alpha lipoic acid and liver transplants
The strange case of’ alpha lipoic acid
A symbolic story
Information taken from:
Burt Berkson “l’ alpha lipoic acid” New Techniques – Milan 2000
translation of Loretta Colosio
ISB 88 481 10789
“When I was all’ University around the mid 60 I was convinced that the doctor was a sheer profession. I was proud to have chosen this profession. Now 30 years I realize that most physicians especially those in positions of power from which they can exercise their authority, I have no wish to consider therapies other than those proposed by pharmaceutical companies. Indeed, as much as it may seem macabre, many physicians would prefer to die their patients rather than save his life with an alternative therapy“. (Dr. Julian Whitaker in the preface to “l’ alpha lipoic acid“Burt Berkson).
On a Sunday of’ October 1977 the young graduate, Dr. Burt Berkson, who worked in a big Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, you had to take care of an elderly couple who had been brought in serious condition following the’ ingestion of poisonous mushrooms.
The Chief told him three things: those were his only patients, not c’ It was nothing to do except keep them under observation and that the’ man would surely die within a few hours.
But Dr. Berkson, young and optimistic, He could not accept the’ idea to just stand there watching his patients suffer and die, so he began to look for, in the depths of his brain, an alternative solution.
I remember reading an article about a European drug successfully used to treat cases of severe liver poisoning. It consisted of’ alpha acid – lipoic acid a naturally occurring substance that our body produces in greater or lesser amounts in our lifetime. As the leading cause of death in patients who ate poisonous mushrooms and l’ hepatic Dr. Berkson intui that this could be a way’ exit.
Administering l’ alpha acid – lipoic acid for both patients, intravenously, and within a few hours, l’ man who had been near death said to feel much better. After three days she was almost back to normal, After a week they were discharged. Liver enzyme levels had returned to normal and their livers had largely rebuilt.
Notwithstanding that the primary, previously, He made it very clear that these patients would die, When they were discharged argued that they would have taken anyway, even without l’ alpha acid – lipoic acid.
I assure you, Indeed, that, as unique, These healings sometimes they happened.
The following weekend was hospitalized a’ other couple with the same diagnosis.
Once the primary claim that both had no chance to survive in those conditions. They too were entrusted to the care of Dr. Berkson, but he was forbidden to use l’ alpha acid – lipoic acid because pharmacists of his hospital had never heard of and the product was not present in the’ list of drugs included all’ Hospital.
Once again Dr. If you hear from inert to stand not Berkson in front of those deaths announced and insisted at the primary to be authorized all’ use of this medication. He was told to wait until the pharmaceutical Committee of’ the hospital had not met to approve l’ use, but the pharmaceutical Committee meeting could not take place that a few days or a few weeks in the meantime l’ human patients rapidly degenerating.
He was told to follow orders and to let these two people or to prepare for harsh criticism.
But this time the Dr. Berkson defied and supplying to both patients an IV containing alpha – lipoic acid.
Immediately he saw the first results. After a few days the liver functions returned to normal, and after ten days patients were discharged in perfect health.
But Dr. Berkson went through anger and vengeance in orthodox medicine. He was about to be fired, but l’ the interest shown by National Institute of Health for the extraordinary healings obtained managed to prevent this injustice.
To Dr. Berkson remained stuck forever l’ label of a doctor disobedient and unable to work as a team.
L’ alpha lipoic acid: one of the most important discoveries in biochemistry
Ignored by physicians and scientists for a long time now this substance, is rising to prominence for its extraordinary properties, also because free of side effects when administered in the right amounts.
Thanks to its beneficial effects on cellular function and useful for treating not only liver diseases, But even the diabetes type 2, l’ immuno depression, l’ AIDS, Psoriasis, Eczema, Burns, skin tumors, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Lou Gehrig's disease and other neurological disorders and degenerative diseases, l’ Rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus, Scleroderma, some autoimmune diseases, many ophthalmic diseases, heart disease, the circulatory disorders of the stroke and l’ atherosclerosis also eliminates many side effects caused by other therapies and if associated to the righteous anti-inflammatory potentiates l’ effect by attenuating the perception of pain in those with severe forms of arthritis.
But what must be emphasized and that the’ using dell’ alpha lipoic acid gave surprising results in stimulating the regeneration of liver tissue in liver transplantation patients.
L’ alpha lipoic acid, in its injectable form, that requires a doctor's prescription, really back my life to people who otherwise would die.
It makes sense that if aging our body produces smaller quantities and must integrate l’ power supply with this substance to keep fit.
There are many scientific studies that deal with this topic.
A very technical work and Lipoic Acid in Health disease by Fuchs et al. (New York, Dekker 1997) cited from the same Berkson.
On the website of the national library of medicine (MEDLINE) typing lipoic acid you finds out l’ existence of many studies that describe the successes with this substance from the amazing features whose only wrong, in the eyes of international executives’ pharmaceutical industry and the cost too little.
for further information we recommend that you visit the website www.antipredazione.org
In recent days, l’ triumphal announcement: no more survivor's pension for widows
I don't know if you will be realized, but it seems to me that Italians are happening today what happened in Poland to the Hebrews after’ Nazi invasion. Every day is a right, every day is a means of subsistence or adds a fee or increase existing taxes and previously unbearable. Everyday life becomes more difficult, not just for the poor. Even the middle classes are rapidly proletarizzando. I do not know how, but this ruling class has even managed to erase the work. In Italy, Maybe, There was full employment ’, but pretty much almost all the citizens could work. Someone with more luck, others with more exploitation, but the work was ’ c. Today, Instead, all manufacturing processes are moved to countries where abuse of slave labor is the easiest thing in the world. Meanwhile in Italy the unemployment in the industry get to paroxysmal levels, the services are abolished or are entrusted to interns, precarious, Teen desperate possibly zero or very close to zero salary. Even the right to education has been virtually erased, not just because the Italians, Although owners of lower wages d ’ Europe are forced to pay higher tuition d’ Europe, but also because the’ introduction of entrance test, as you'd expect, excluded from’ access all’ University all those who could not make use of political or economic spondature. Now l’ latest buzz is to take the survivor's pension to widows. It is not a return to’ Europe of 1800, is a return to Poland of 1939…
(Photo taken by “the pianist” by Roman Polanski, many films worth watching)
UNCONSTITUTIONALITY’ PENSION REFORM MONTI/FORNERO
The Constitutional Court may, If you want to, declare d’ Office l’ unconstitutionality of any law it deems to be contrary to the constitutional.
The financial 2011 launched by Mario Monti, that contains the so called "reform" of pensions, is grossly unconstitutional both in content and in the procedure used for approval.
Unconstitutional in the procedure because the law is provided in our Constitution to art. 77 like how eccezionalissima to be used only in exceptional cases of necessity and urgency. We were made to believe that the necessity and urgency were due to spread that weakened our bonds and to the serious international financial situation, And then, as it turns out, the spread After approval of the decree law did not at all lowered. While, for absurd, the spread has dropped just after the resignation of Monti.
The rest is contrary to the Constitution (In addition to ethically treacherous) also include the so called "reform" of pensions within a Finance Act to prevent people to abolish this unjust law with a normal referendum (It is not allowed referendum for budgetary and tax laws – art. 75 Cost.).
This is a system to prevent citizens to avail themselves of constitutional instruments places for their protection is quite obvious, just think of the fact that the extension of the retirement age If anything affects the budget of INPS not those Italian State and that the extension of the retirement age has nothing to do with the tributes.
It is also clear that payments made directly by the workers for their pensions are employees owned Denarii and are therefore not public money, so also the pension payments made by undertakings on the position of each individual worker are deferred salaries and as such also be worker-owned. It is therefore evident that the pensions of workers, albeit not yet perceived are not public money.
So it is clear that the introduction of such rules (For more severely detrimental to the fundamental human rights guaranteed by the Constitution) within a budget law is in itself a serious breach of constitutional principles reprehensible by the Consulta.
There is yet to add that, with unorthodox systems, It has also prevented the classroom discussion of the decree-law and that it has been previously approved by the various political parties in this House since the approval of the decree-law was connected the vote of confidence to the Government, in clear violation of the provisions of art. 72 of the Constitution (enshrining the polling obbiligo read article by article). And the vote of confidence in the Government was induced with the threat that if he hadn't voted confidence in Government assemble Italy would fall in a very serious financial crisis. What for other possible since Monti is the world's major financiers that certain spondato they would not hesitate to give him ina hand to that effect. Aside from the fact that even the statistics seem to be uncontrollable if not quite time for dancers, thing that affect their trust root. Anyway it's odd that he's been massively voted in Parliament this financial that no person with average honesty and minimal knowledge of our Constitution and of the General principles of law could never vote.
The Finance Act passed by the Government is then also unconstitutional content because:
- increases dramatically the retirement age for women (including the retirement age the old-age pension) even for someone who was already close to retirement and this in serious contrast with the Arts. 3, 31, 35, 37, 38 and 53 the Italian Constitution (art. 3: ”all citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law without distinction of sex, breed, language, religion, political opinions, personal and social conditions ", art. 31: "the Republic assists with economic measures and other provisions the formation of the family and the fulfilment of tasks", art. 35: "the Republic protects work in all its forms and applications", art. 37: “working women have the same rights and, for equal work, the same remuneration accruing to the employee. Working conditions must allow the fulfilment of her family function”, art. 38: “every citizen unable to work and without means to live has a right to maintenance and social assistance. Workers who are EXPECTED AND MAKE means adapted to their needs in the event of an accident, disease, disability and old age, involuntary unemployment ...(omissis) ... to the tasks provided for in this article shall state organs and institutions provided or incorporated”, art. 53: "everyone is expected to contribute to the public expense because of their ability to pay. The tax system is informed on criteria of progressivity " ).
More specifically, the Mountain is at odds with the reform art. 38 the Constitution because PRE – WELFARE INSTITUTION It means being able to PRE – SEE its future in case of old age and all workers and particularly women workers were put in condition of being unable to PRE – see the moment of their retirement, rather than be taken by surprise by stepping out of retirement by reforms that even move, in any case, ten years foreseeable at the date of their expected retirement and recruitment. It is now apparent that – at least as far as the pension insurance – whether the Berlusconi government reforms that the Government UNCONSTITUTIONAL and serious MOUNTAINS financial say unconstitutional, not unconstitutional, because I mean that they are patently antithetical to our Constitution further that contrary to our Constitution. Because it is obvious that you can't move the date of retirement for the old-age pension for those who have already begun to work without blocking the worker to predict its future. This is also in contrast to the art. 3 of the Constitution which enshrines one of the most important internationally proclaimed human rights: the equality of citizens before the law. If you think that have been particularly affected certain categories of persons – especially those born in the years 1951 -1952 -1953 We understand that by Here the racial laws shortly we miss. In this regard I would like to recall that until a few decades ago, settled and undisputed Supreme Court considered unchangeable social security laws (also related to a retirement pension) for those who had already begun working. It was thought, In fact, that constituted a serious violation of the art. 38 of the Constitution, Edit in itinere the worker's pension conditions which had already started to pay contributions according to some pre – pension fund (or pre – vision) its future. It was a right and sacrosanct principle. Also because the old, you know, no longer have the strength to protest about the abuses that are implemented against them and must be preserved at least by law in their fundamental rights. On the other hand is right that after a lifetime of work (and substantial payments) You can get a return that – I repeat – is not a gracious gift of the State, but a salary already gained in the course of their working lives.
And esodati? has anyone been safeguarded some not. I insist on saying that the racial laws shortly we miss. However it is indubitable that this is, at least, of gross violations of human rights. And even serious violations of truth. In fact I heard proponents of Monti respond about it in some talk shows that the Government has done a great deal for prematurely allocating several million euro. Crazy! The modern ritual, like all workers have paid good money for years to INPS or other pension funds to see itself recognized the Board then established criteria, And then, on reaching the finish line, These policies are unilaterally changed by preventing their every forward-thinking, While the Government declares that to fix things had to earmark funds. But, of grace, where did the contributions paid by workers and businesses? And then to whom or to which the State would pay those funds? I am ready to repeat ad nauseam that pensions pay INPS, but I do not think that SOCIAL SECURITY's budget have been allocated additional funds from the State for esodati. And then what do we do with the mathematical? There's no way that social security did not have the funds to PA pensions to modern ritual for two reasons. First of all because the INPS on the date of the Reformation Monti – Fornero not had the accounts in red, Secondly why INPS, like any provident fund, is required to adjust its balance sheets to the mathematical. The mathematical reserve is calculated by the actuary by which you determine which assets the Pension Fund must have in order to guarantee the pensions of future cash 5 years. It is therefore unthinkable that from day one we can see that social security can no longer father pensions. If actuarial accounts state that the capital held by INPS isn't enough to pay pensions, the word gets out 5 years before, in time to run for cover without damage none. So they can't happen dramas as what we have just witnessed, or, in any case, starring.
Finally the reform Monti is contrary to the Arts. 3, 31 and 37 of the Constitution also perchélafissazione old-age pension for women in early measure compared to male counterparts was a rule introduced to restore equality of working women than their male counterparts because women have always a double work and operate at least this little constitutionally guaranteed compensation (art. 37 Cost.: “working women have the same rights and, for equal work, the same remuneration accruing to the employee " in this sense, the anticipation of pension insurance represented and represents a very small remuneration compensation for double work always played) This rule also allowed women to take care of your family (in 55 years in general women undergo an additional overload of work having to assist elderly parents and in-laws seniors and still at that age you become grandmothers and also take care of grandchildren, in today's world, definitely have a working mother is looking after your family). But if you delete this rule, where do they finish the facilities provided by the art. 31 the Constitution and the adaptation of working conditions to family obligations provided for by art. 37 the Constitution itself? obviously also Mountains contrast with the reform art. 35 of the Constitution which establishes the protection of work in all its forms and applications women are also family obligations work.
The Italian Constitution reform seriously contrasts Mountains theme of tax fairness. Our Constitution indeed provides for the art. 53 that everyone should contribute to the public expense because of their ability to pay and that the tax system is informed on the principles of progressiveness. It is now apparent that the extension of the retirement age means in fact impose a heavy tax only on the backs of workers . Just as an example: a worker gains one thousand two hundred euros per month and that is about to retire with a thousand euros per month, calculating an increase in the retirement age by five years, is actually sentenced to pay a fee of € 65.000 (diconsi sixty five thousand euros), that is equal to the amount of the pension which was defrauded. Because if the salary is paid in the face of the provision, the pension is paid anyway: It's just money. Basically if I work I get paid, While the pension is paid to me although I don't work, and indeed I might perceive a pension and put me to work, the two things are not incompatible. In addition as already mentioned, the pension is deferred salary then it comes to amounts already owned by workers that the State, with total discretion, eminent domain – it is not known why – in favour of INPS. So it's obvious that Mario Monti, with this law, in fact, has severely taxed the poor leaving unscathed the rich. Everyone understands that a fee, and in one shot, by 65.000 Euro borne by a worker who, with his sweat, earn one thousand two hundred euros per month is a charge absolutely unequal and openly contrary to the art. 53 of the Constitution because it goes beyond – and many more – the ability to pay of that citizen. All the more so since, by definition, This tax was applied only to those who work while the real rich living of financial income without work and without having ever worked are completely free ("Italy is a Democratic Republic founded on work". Faced with these things also article 1 the Constitution sounds ironic now). It is clear that any tax should weigh on general taxation, not on individual categories of people because otherwise we fall back again into a serious infringement of article. 3 of the Constitution, fundamental article, universal and indispensable that enshrines the equality of citizens before the law, before the State, any public institution.
lto reform Mounts contrasts with the most basic principles of private law. In fact any motorist insurance conditions fixed at the time of payment of the award against the commitment on the part of the insurance to pay at the time of the occurrence of the insured event. Instead the reform Monti has practically exempt the institution from paying due when, for many people, already there had been the agreed conditions of the "left", that is, of their survival until the retirement age. As if the motorist after paying diligently on insurance premium till the last penny's whereabouts before defaulting insurance in case of accident because a State law has exempted from its obligations. Nothing would be more unfair and absurd if it were simple insurance contracts subscribed by private. As workers ' pensions and even more of old-age pensions, and even more of deferred salaries, We fall back into something worse that, in my opinion, is a real crime, that, I hope, Italian prosecutors want to discern.
In essence this pension reform was rather strange: In fact, as mentioned above, pensions pay INPS the INPS and the budget is distinct and separate from that of the State. Moreover, the budget of the INPS, for years, is not in red. Indeed in 1996 have been (as it seems) turned to INPS about 10 billion euro GESCAL funds (i.e. funds paid by all Italian workers to build their houses of subsidized housing). These funds had not been GESCAL never used (I wonder why) for the purpose for which they were constituted and – according to the law and various rulings of the Constitutional Court – could be used for other services on behalf of workers who had paid. The Minister Dini stated then that funds GESCAL would be used to finance its pension reform. As it happens, however, that Dini reform not only did not recognize an extra penny to the workers, but, if anything, took away their rights and money, Therefore it is not clear what these are used 10 billion euro of which, Since then, you no longer have any news. Of the rest, as it known, social security is not only a social security institution, but also provides assistance pensions, i.e. poor people who have never paid pensions nothing. These pensions should be financed by the State with the general taxation and instead are treacherously financed by contributions from workers. Social security also provides corporate financing in the form of financing vocational training courses. I therefore believe that a lot of the funding GESCAL have gone to firms to finance activities that would have been made anyway, at the expense of the same companies. The fact remains that the State, as such, certainly does not finance the pensions of workers.
So if anything is social security that (in stark contrast with the constitutional), with the money of the workers, until now funded status (and businesses), not vice versa.
So where is the interest of the State to reduce the retirement age and the amounts of pensions? Maybe to be still arbitrarily finance by INPS some other disbursement in favor of big business? or maybe all this was done because a few months later had to take place, as it happened, Fusion in the INPS Boyar Pension Fund of State, What to understand which pays pensions 30 thousand euros per month to people who, at best, he warmed up a Chair for years and at worst has bankrupted the State company who administered? Needless to say this Fund pensionsottolineando cher i referred, at the time, can't remember the name, He came to INPS bringing stratospheric debt. But this news has moved quickly on the news and no one commented on it, evidently not to emphasize too ....
For all the reasons above, in January 2012 I sent a complaint – lawsuit to all Prosecutors in Italy demanding that all the perpetrators of this massacre were prosecuted for attempt on Constitution (a crime that involves the smallest 12 years in prison) and I sent in June 2012 a complaint to the Constitutional Court asking that it be declared, ex officio, the unconstitutionality of the Reformation Monti Fornero and all previous reforms that have changed for the worse for workers the Italian pension situation.
This I did because the reform mountains and other similar reforms were incorporated in financial laws to prevent them required a referendum and why the reform Monti also prevents citizens to bring cases before the Constitutional Court with a normal appeal within a procedure.
For now the Court Costituzioale did not give any hint of reply. I then posted a petition on Avaaz, to prevent my exposed fall into oblivion. If we are many to sign the Constitutional Court cannot ignore our requests. I urge all those who agree with what I wrote to give your membership to the petition by clicking on the following link:
http://www.avaaz.org/it/petition/giu_le_mani_dalle_pensioni/
30 January 2013
Donatella Savasta Fiore
The distressed
No one can tolerate that the movement 5 Star is at opposition
Everytime I turn the
01 June 1974 I feel bad. Parliament today only took office and are already three days they all attack the elect of the movement 5 Stars as if they were the real culprits of the collapse Italian. Have not yet been able to say "beeh" I already do not let you talk. A show unworthy.
But where is democracy? Where are the rights of citizens and voters if even we hear (and I heard him say, Alas, repeatedly) the Constitution does not mandate constraint, implying with these words that the newly elected are free, indeed obliged to do exactly the opposite of what they promised to voters during the election campaign. Continue reading
Political Elections 2013
THE VICTORY OF THE MOVEMENT 5 STAR UNLEASHES THE UNCONSCIOUS COMEDY OF ITALIAN POLITICIANS
I've never had so much as to listen to television these days post election comments.
A mature and distinguished Lady, apparently the author of a most learned book that tells the story of Cricket, you are thrown into a tirade against the Italian people that in his opinion would still not be ready to vote en masse for a sober and moderate party that represents the cream of the "intelligentsia" international. Seems strange, but he alluded to PD.
Another young and rampant maiden – always adhering to the PD – kept repeating: "we will have to just, in the next few days, question the causes of this loss of ratings ".
But how?! Did you support the Government endorsing, sight unseen, alongside Berlusconi and associates, most unjust and undemocratic measures of postwar Italian history memories and you wonder why many voters deserted your lists. But I am amazed that you have a vote, removed those your and your families!
Take for example the pension reform: have you thrown out of business a few hundred thousand people (the modern ritual, but not only) they have found themselves without pay and no pension after 40 years of honest work and contributions paid and you took the Board to all other.
I summarize briefly the situation: Maroni reform Berlusconi had already moved the age/retirement pension of women – in one go – from 55 in 60 years. Then came the Reformation Monti/Fornero which further moved the retirement age for old-age pension, for all, from 60 years to 67 years. In recent months however chimed in I don't know what the autogrowth quotient determined by law and – in fact – today , for all workers still in service retirement age, for old age, has been moved to 70 years. Then, someone – particularly if woman – you've seen moving forward retirement age even 15 years.
To "compensate" for this serious abuse of power, the quantum the pension was, then, greatly reduced by applying the contribution system, for which, against all logic, more working, more contributions pour and less retirement takes. In essence, no debate nor social nor parliamentary, our retirement planning has been transformed by solidarity system in financial system. In fact you are forced workers to sign some sort of risky derivative with the savings that were supposed to guarantee them an older age.
All this is grossly unconstitutional as well as supremely unfair. Because it represents an imposition of a heavy tax solely on the working classes.
In fact, the Board is not a gracious gift from the State and is not part of the welfare, But it's, on one side, deferred salary paid by companies and on the other a provision paid by workers with their salary deductions. State money isn't at all nor the State budget because these monies are paid to INPS or pension funds of competence, so it is unexplained action with ordinary logic.
I'll give an example that serves to clarify the situation: We envision a Fiat worker who earns 1.200 euros per month and would have been entitled to 60 years to a retirement 1.000 Euro per month. Moving of his retirement ten years later cost him no small amount of 130.000 Euro (Yes: 130,000 euro i.e. 1.000 euros per month 13 monthly payment = 13.000 Euro l’ year, for 10 years = 130,000 euro). Then a worker in 1.200 euros per month in salary was taxed in one shot of 130.000 Euro. Because the pension is money. In fact, the Board is not incompatible with the wages. But no rich in Italy was required to pay a tribute so burdensome in absolute terms.
Article 53 the Italian Constitution: "everyone is expected to contribute to the public expense because of their ability to pay. The tax system is informed on criteria of progressivity ". But how do you argue that a sudden imposition of 130.000 euro on a person who earns 1.200 euros per month is proportionate to its ability to pay and income?!
If you add that this so called "reform" is also opposed to other fundamental rights guaranteed by our Constitution which: the art. 3: ”all citizens have equal social dignity and are equal before the law without distinction of sex, breed, language, religion, political opinions, personal and social conditions ", the art. 31: "the Republic assists with economic measures and other provisions the formation of the family and the fulfilment of tasks", the art. 35: "the Republic protects work in all its forms and applications", the art. 37: “working women have the same rights and, for equal work, the same remuneration accruing to the employee. Working conditions must allow the fulfilment of her family function”, art. 38: “every citizen unable to work and without means to live has a right to maintenance and social assistance. Workers who are EXPECTED AND MAKE means adapted to their needs in the event of an accident, disease, disability and old age, involuntary unemployment ...(omissis) ... to the tasks provided for in this article shall state organs and institutions provided or incorporated"we understand that the increase in the retirement age covered much more as the sustenance of the democratic State.
But if you don't you will not even realize that all kinds of disconnected from income taxes (IMU including), and impose them for more just on the backs of the poor is unfair, unconstitutional and is losing votes, does it just mean you can't see beyond their noses, and that is all the more reason you are not able to govern a nation.
But let's continue with what fun these days.
The question: "what will be, in your opinion, the first thing to be done by the Government?"they felt the most disparate answers: politics, legality, election, economy, taxes, development, especially work, job, job (no mention of salary, It is obvious).
No one dreamed of saying that the first thing to do is abolish the/Fornero Mountains on pensions reform. Yet there is no easiest thing to do to give this country a bit of social justice and the immediate resumption of employment turnover both in public and in private enterprise uses.
It seems to me that one hundred thousand esodati who return to have an income can already give a small boost to microeconomics. Not to mention the new hires that would open for retirement of eligible.
And then always remains to clarify the mystery of bottom: because the Italian Government has initiated this reform which has exempted the INPS (and other funds) from paying due?
At the risk of repeating myself: the abolition of pensions does not affect the State budget. INPS has an autonomous budget and different, for other not in red. We were told that the reform was needed because there were no more money, but this is technically not possible, first of all because it's not just about SOCIAL SECURITY's budget but also of other pension funds and it is very unlikely that they're all in trouble, then why all the social security budgets should be adjusted to mathematical, that is to the underlying actuarial calculations that set every five years which shall be the sum set aside to guarantee the pensions of five years. Then either it is said that all the actuaries of all pension funds have miscalculated resoundingly (and maybe on some proxy would be interested to know why) or else you have to admit that this law was passed based on false pretenses.
Why? You can only make assumptions:
1. The Government has gotten his hands on with a measure taken prior to the occurrence of the harmful event and impoverente formed by the subsequent merger in INPS (deliberate afterwards by the Government) Some pension funds that were supposed to secure old age indebitatissimi Boyar status billionaire ?
2. The Monti Government slavishly obeyed the demands of dragons and Trichet that, No one knows for what reason, claimed these human sacrifices?
3. The Government has obeyed the club BILDELBERG that, at the international level, He wants the complete abolition of pensions because that would be an essential condition in order to proceed to further globalization prelusiva of the new world order?
Maybe you don't have to choose between one and the other hypothesis, Maybe it is all of these things together. But whatever the cause it is a shameful cause, unfair and unlawful. So much so that it is kept hidden or otherwise is not expressed with clarity.
The illegality needs shade.